ragingyoghurt

Category Archives: chocolate

0

the best part is that it was a spur-of-the-moment decision. i had just come from the medicare office with a $65 refund still warm and glowing in my wallet. it was lunchtime, and after i exhausted the list in my head of cheap and acceptable city eateries where i might find sustenance, it struck me that i could (should!) take myself to the lindt cafe while the kid was off bonding with her grandmother somewhere in the hills district, being plied with crayons and sketchbooks and fairy wings, and forcefed pink cupcakes.

it was all in the name of comprehensive research of course, but after the travesty of the guylian cafe “chocolate” milkshake, i thought i should give the one at lindt a go.

it was extremely busy, but the friendly waitress was happy to answer such questions as, “between the iced chocolate and the chocolate milkshake, which is milkier?” and, “and which is chocolatier?”. no, her bright smile never once faltered, as she replied that the milkshake is milkier, and that they were both chocolatey and decadent, and the main difference between the two was that the iced chocolate contained ice.

and it was just as a chocolate milkshake should be. a $7 chocolate milkshake even! rich, dark chocolatey flavour. just thick enough that your cheeks let you know you were making an effort sucking. served in a tall, weighty glass. topped with a mound of dark and white chocolate shavings.

bliss! and nicely tempered by a perfectly toasted (and corrugated) schiacciata filled with delicate slices of roast lamb, grilled eggplant, baby spinach and ricotta.

posted by ragingyoghurt on 16 October 2008 at 9:17 pm
permalink | filed under around town, chocolate, lunch

6

as we walked that stretch of circular quay between the lego blocks and the cardboard cartons yesterday, we were stunned to see that a chocolate cafe had materialised in the toaster, right next to the dendy cinemas. mid-afternoon, after the rain had cleared, and a modest skyscraper had been constructed out of five cardboard boxes, we popped into the brand-spankin’-new guylian belgian chocolate cafe.

it was an impulsive move: we had eaten lunch not too long ago, and the kid was in that precarious mid-afternoon mood. but what do you do when 1. you stumble upon a new chocolate cafe and 2. you decide on a whim to enter said cafe? you can’t really have just a cup of tea and a biscuit.

can you?

well. we certainly couldn’t. as i read down the list in the menu (which took rather longer than necessary to be presented), the kid expressed her interest in certain items by repeating them back at me.

“cheesecake!” she said at one point. and then, “milkshake!”.

all right then. the dark chocolate buche filled with raspberry cream would just have to wait.

the dark chocolate raspberry cheesecake, though, appeared soon enough, a squat slice cut from a fat, round cake. it was surrounded by swirls and puddles — raspberry coulis and white chocolate sauce — and the kid went straight for the heart-shaped pool of red. the cake itself was dense and chocolatey, sitting on a base of slightly soggy, lemon-scented biscuit crumb, and there were clearly bits of real raspberries in it: we crunched on the seeds. although it seemed like a modest serve when it arrived, in the end it remained unvanquished. would this have been different if we had been less laden with lunch? or if the cake had been that bit more delicious?

perhaps it was the milkshake’s fault. though for something called “chocolate shake”, it wasn’t overly chocolatey. in fact, i wouldn’t even say it was chocolatish. what it was mostly, was a glass of cold milk, with a small, partially intact scoop of vanilla ice cream in it, and the inside of the glass had been zigzagged with molten chocolate, which, by virtue of sitting in a volume of cold milk, had solidified completely. how very strange to have to scrape these trails of hard chocolate off the surface of the glass.

i guess if it had been an actual chocolatey chocolate shake, we might have died. as it is, we didn’t even get to the bottom of the glass. there were a lot of milkshakes going round that afternoon, and trade in general seemed brisk. when i asked the guy behind the counter when they’d opened, he said, only a little agitatedly, “two days ago”.

i really must work on getting my tolerance for rich chocolate desserts back up to the levels they were five years ago. you must know by now, the adriano zumbo chocolate cafe opens at the end of the week.

posted by ragingyoghurt on 7 October 2008 at 10:45 pm
permalink | filed under around town, cake, chocolate, kid

1

the more observant amongst you would have noticed a crusty little nugget in the previous macaron-skewed post. it is a caramel truffle, which, when i saw it behind glass, seemed unordinary, because its sugary surface was adorned with little beads of caramel. i took it as a good sign, but i had little idea then that when i bit through the granulated sugar crust, there would be nothing else beneath but soft, salty, buttery caramel; those beads were the molten caramel which had broken through!

thus, you might conclude that the crust is just a vehicle for getting a glob of caramel into your gob without making too much of a mess. thing is, i could’ve sworn that amongst those grains of sugar, there were also a few grains of salt. ’twas a fine vehicle indeed.

posted by ragingyoghurt on 6 July 2008 at 5:56 pm
permalink | filed under chocolate

5

breakfast, sunday morning, 9am.

saturday afternoon, we stopped by luneburger for lunch, on the way to the kinokuniya zine fair. as i finished my delicious sunflower-seeded roll filled with pastrami, cheese and salad, i glanced over at the counter and discovered that a whole new tray of sweet buns had appeared during the course of our little meal. it really was an amazing sight, and in my mind i was already eating one for breakfast before i had even returned to the counter to buy it.

[ countergirl, visibly surprised: “oh! you were just here!” ]

behold: the chocolate-crumble roll. a base of plain yeasty bun topped with a monstrous amount of soft, crumbly, cocoa-rich biscuit and a flirty zigzag of sugary icing. in fact, the edges of the pastry were all crumb, and in the end, too much even for one and a half chocolate-mad girls.

of course, we anticipated none of this after the zine fair, when we returned to the underground labyrinth around town hall station to finally cash in my krispy kreme birthday voucher from two birthdays ago.

there’s nothing like a free doughnut sundae to bring cheer to a random unbirthday celebration. i picked the current promotion doughnut — “chokkolate” glazed — and a scoop of boysenberry ripple, and the kid chose “rainbow”. mmm… lurid. honestly, i wasn’t expecting too much of the ice cream; i figured it would be like if you ordered a grilled fish meal at KFC… turns out it’s super premium stuff, rich and creamy with an almost stretchy texture. totally outdid the doughnut i thought, which was after all the regular yeast doughnut, with a fudgey chocolate glaze, just like the name sez. i don’t know why i thought it would be chocolate on the inside too.

it’s probably just as well it wasn’t though, given the breakfast we were up against in the new day.

probably.

posted by ragingyoghurt on 29 June 2008 at 10:47 pm
permalink | filed under around town, cake, chocolate, ice cream

4

meanwhile, over at adriano zumbo patissier, the salty-sweet treats keep a-coming.

this is the way it happens: the winter cakes aren’t due in-store until july, i’m told, and i’ve tried all of the current season that i care to — i think the only one i didn’t fancy was the death star filled with peanut butter — so i cast my attention towards the other display case, the one that normally holds the macarons; of late it seems to also be brimming with chocolate!

on a recent visit, i procured a lemon macaron, a pale yellow beauty that proved to be soft and moist, with a mild and fragrant citrus filling well-tempered by white chocolate ganache.

but it was really the pistachio chocolate pressed up against the glass which enticed me more, with its swirl of pistachio paste atop a dark chocolate cup, sprinkled in chopped nuts. once i broke through the delicate dark chocolate though, i discovered that it was half-filled with regular praline. sigh. if only it had been all pistachio, nyup nyup.

thing is, after i had made my selection, i started discussing the rest of the assortment with the countergirl, which in retrospect was quite the tactical error. for i pointed to a dark brown square anointed with a dab of silver, and was informed that it was a strawberry-balsamic chocolate. clearly i would have to return.

when i did, some days later, there was something new again: a dark chocolate dome encrusted with flakes of salt. “what’s that?” i breathed.

turns out it was filled with caramel. i ate the one placed in my hand by the counterboy, to settle our discussion on whether it was a soft, runny or hard, chewy caramel. it’s just semantics really… my runny is your chewy. what it was, in the end, was great. amazing, even. i immediately bought another.

and the strawberry-balsamic one, which surprised me with its square of sturdy jelly — all at once tart and tangy and savoury — perched atop a tablet of milky-chocolatey-praliney something, enrobed in dark chocolate. not too shabby at all.

but the caramel… o the caramel.

posted by ragingyoghurt on 20 June 2008 at 10:07 pm
permalink | filed under chocolate

2

singapore girl finally made it to balmain last week; she’d heard about a particular cake shop i like to go to. so there we were, thinking we were safe by going for lunch beforehand, to line our stomachs, but we left zumbo with two cakes for now and a bag of macaron for later.

reading it off the little plaque in the shop, charlotte o’hara sounds like one of those eccentric ladies with too many voices in her head: biscuit cuillere, ginger and vanilla bavarois, lime creme, fig, basil and pistachio jelly… and if you were to eat each element one at a time, as i did to start, then you might think the bavarois too gingery, or the jelly too figgy. but i’ve heard more than one person say it — including the countergirl — that all the flavours come together into one great superflavour, and it’s true.

truly, this is alchemy at work. i could not decide if i should eat it fast, or slow. it was light and delicate, and certainly could’ve been inhaled. but that would only have brought matters to an end much too quickly.

after all, she got all gussied up for us: see her bonnet of bright raspberries, plump and bursting with tart flavour. the neat ring of meringue, the fine ribbons of lime zest and white chocolate. the finery on the outside, though, belied a primness within. we took our time with her.

the pace slowed even more for essaouira. turns out that charlotte o’hara is all sweetness and light — but only while you’re eating it. once it’s down your gullet, all the richness of the cream and butter remind you how debauched your time together really was.

but try and stop. try and say no to the slim plaques of dark chocolate that break with such a satisfying crack. try and resist the piped rows of dark chocolate chantilly creme, and the ones beneath of orange ganache. the base of cakey hazelnut dacquoise and crunchy praline feulletine were most persuasive. all up, essaouira reminded me of the chocolate-covered, orange-flavoured wafers of my childhood — which only made me love it more.

and i did stop eating it after all, for i feared that i might die. i left the smallest little corner for quite a way after dinner. i ate it in the dark.

posted by ragingyoghurt on 27 May 2008 at 10:18 pm
permalink | filed under cake, chocolate

1

the aftermath of easter.

the half eaten, donnie darko, cheap pink bunny.

the countdown to the rock show.

the unsettling feeling of going it alone.

[ the photo by maeve ]

posted by ragingyoghurt on 29 March 2008 at 10:46 am
permalink | filed under chocolate, kid

7

we walked up the steps from kings cross station with a cakebox in our hands. heading towards potts point, i lamented, “we still haven’t been to yellow.” but on this fine sunday, we weren’t too bummed; we were on our way to the 95th birthday celebration of an old family friend (uncle rowan has known me since i was four), and more importantly, our cakebox was from adriano zumbo patissier. inside it was an enormous chocolate-passionfruit tart.

it had been a slightly surreal morning. earlier on, we’d been watching adriano on kochie’s show, after a txt from trusty deborah alerted us to the fact. some moments later, the phone rang and my sister picked up. “this is adriano,” said the voice on the other line: the cake was running late. we’d called in to order it the day before, and on the receipt it said, “envious 8 inch”, chortle snort.

but so there we were, scurrying through the back streets of the cross, thinking about cake. we got to rowan’s to find our aunt unpacking curries from her car: a fine chicken vindaloo and a sweet pumpkin-cashewnut affair, it turned out, but they were only formalities before the main event.

rowan had been receiving guests all morning, and each one had brought him a cake. on the dining table in the formal dining room sat a modest sponge, layered with cream and dulce de leche. it had already been divided into dainty slices, and a third of them had been eaten. beside it, the hummingbird cake, presented personally by simmone logue — who lives downstairs — was still intact, the birthday greeting writ large on a plank of white chocolate. the envious had begun to sag during its trip east, so we whisked it into the fridge. shortly after, another guest arrived, with a large cakebox in her arms. the sticker on the packaging read, “yellow”! it was shaping up to be a most impressive birthday cake buffet.

i know you know i was excited about the zumbo chocolate-passionfruit tart, because i’d had it before, and i knew that it would be great. the yellow cake, on the other hand, was mysterious and new. well, it was a large brown brick, and we saw raspberries. the top was smooth dark ganache, adorned with three bits of goldleaf, crumpled just so; the middle was layers of chocolate mousse (wherein lay the raspberries) and sponge; the base was a flavoursome dacquoise — i’m calling it hazelnut. it was extremely enjoyable.

the caramel sponge was an interlude of innocent fun. (and i made no overtures towards the hummingbird cake, because, um, it’s healthy?)

but the envious: look at it! truly a celebration cake. it reminds me of jesus riding into jerusalem, with all those palm fronds waving about, and the bounty of golden macarons. the pastry is crisp and perfect, the filling full and rich. it hits you all at once, this tart burst of passionfruit, and then the low notes of caramel and chocolate, and then your mouth is empty, the last vestiges melted off your tongue so you are immediately ready for more.

i couldn’t eat more than the two tiny slices i’d had right then, but when my aunt took charge and divided the remaining cake amongst the guests (“he has diabetes! he will die if he has to eat all of this!” is what she said), i did not protest too much. after dinner that night, i thought i’d straighten up the giant wedge of envious that had come home with me, but as i trimmed a little bit off this side and then that, my destiny became clear. at some point i thought i’d save the mini macaron for later, maybe even for the kid, but nah. that went too.

posted by ragingyoghurt on 26 February 2008 at 11:18 pm
permalink | filed under cake, chocolate

6

really, we can’t get enough of the sprinkles.

so, ho ho, we made gingerbread, at the start of the month, and again on tuesday. any excuse to break out the all-natural-coloured sprinkles, the startlingly fake-coloured flowers, and the silver dragees. that long-ago gift of a tin of pink dean and deluca sugar came in handy too. we even went out in search of tiny candies, and returned with a package of pez (with a very blond disney princess dispenser) and a tube of mini m’n’ms.

small was crucial, because the gingerbread-house cutters i had found were for gingerbread houses about two inches tall. and the gingerbread-man cutter i’d been given for my birthday (thanks, sonya!) were for similarly-statured gingerbread men.

the kid takes a somewhat freeform approach to decorating the little men: as many little m’n’ms as she can fit. which makes for quite a lovely, chocolatey biscuit.

and so i leave you with this: the waitrose gingerbread recipe. i used backstrap molasses instead of golden syrup —

[ now. given the choice between a locally-produced molasses, which is a by-product of the sugar-refining process, or the organic molasses produced solely for its end result of molasses… way the hell over in peru, which would be the ethical choice? do you buy local, or organic free trade air miles? does it make a difference if the organic one has a pretty label, while the local one is kind of plain and has a black trickle down the side of the jar where it has leaked out like a by-product of say, a petroleum-refining process? these are the thoughts that went through my head as i stood in the aisle of the health food shop. imagine the thoughts i had while debating whether or not to use a raw egg white icing recipe! ]

— and a couple more teaspoons of a couple more spices (cinnamon and nutmeg), and ended up with a dark brown biscuit, crisp and crunchy. it was very sweet, and still not really spicy.

my plane leaves in about three hours. my fingers are numb.

happy xmas to you.

posted by ragingyoghurt on 21 December 2007 at 1:30 pm
permalink | filed under cake, candy, chocolate, kid, kitchen

11

here’s the thing: i really like chocolate, and i really like cake… but when confronted with a display case full of treats, i’d more likely get the pink thing filled with cream and berries. as you have witnessed.

every now and again though, a chocolate cake unleashes a call so strong that i cannot resist. well. i’d been resisting the cha cha cha at zumbo for a while, before i finally succumbed (three weeks ago now, sigh, how time does fly).

but, so. what you may have already noticed about this cake, is that it actually contains no “cake”. the base is sesame-riddled pate sable, sure, but the rest of this artful construction is all thin planes of chocolate and fat trails of ganache — two layers of comforting milky-chocolatey ganache, and a feisty middle layer of quite burny chilli-dark-chocolate ganache. surprising, the level of heat, though not as surprising as the salt wash on the underside of each piece of chocolate.

you probably know that i dabble in chocolate-covered pretzels — the bigger the grains of salt embedded in ’em, the better. i have no qualms about mixing sweet and salty (though possibly, i am not quite ready for the jam-vegemite combo suggested to me in the past), and a few months ago, when i saw these earthy granules of chocolate-dipped fleur de sel, i was smitten. and so, the salt-wash chocolate? it was compelling, and although at first i couldn’t work out where the salt was — and if i was only imagining it — once i isolated the source, i couldn’t stop licking it. the disappointment that came with the end of the salt was only fleeting; the smooth dark chocolate took away that ache.

this is not a warm and comfy dessert. it is punchy and aggressive… perfect, as it turns out, for savouring slowly on the eve of a thirty-fifth birthday, while watching the season finale of “californication”.

(and why “cha cha cha”? one “cha” less, and it would’ve been a fitting tribute to that scary girl in “grease”. feisty!)

posted by ragingyoghurt on 5 December 2007 at 10:47 pm
permalink | filed under cake, chocolate
« older posts
newer posts »
  • Click

    • here
    • there
  • Categories

    • (after a) fashion
    • around town
    • art
    • at the movies
    • blog
    • bookshelf
    • boy
    • breakfast
    • cake
    • candy
    • chocolate
    • dinner
    • drawn
    • drink
    • grumble
    • ice cream
    • kid
    • kitchen
    • lunch
    • misc
    • nellie
    • packaging
    • shoping
    • snacks
    • something new
    • soundtrack
    • trip
    • tv
    • werk
  • Archives

    • August 2012
    • June 2012
    • May 2012
    • March 2012
    • February 2012
    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • July 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • November 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • December 2009
    • November 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
    • October 2007
    • September 2007
    • August 2007
    • July 2007
    • June 2007
    • May 2007
    • April 2007
    • March 2007
    • February 2007
    • January 2007
    • December 2006
    • November 2006
    • October 2006
    • September 2006
    • August 2006
    • July 2006
    • June 2006
    • May 2006
    • April 2006
    • March 2006
    • February 2006
    • January 2006
    • December 2005
    • November 2005
    • October 2005
    • September 2005
    • June 2005
    • May 2005
    • April 2005
    • March 2005
    • February 2005
    • January 2005
    • December 2004
    • November 2004
    • October 2004
    • September 2004
    • August 2004
    • July 2004
    • June 2004
    • May 2004
    • April 2004
    • March 2004
    • February 2004
    • January 2004
    • December 2003
    • November 2003
    • October 2003
    • September 2003
    • August 2003
    • July 2003
    • June 2003
    • May 2003
    • April 2003
    • March 2003
    • February 2003
    • November 2002
    • August 2002
    • March 2002
    • January 2002
    • November 2001
    • September 2001
    • September 2000
    • August 2000
    • April 2000
    • February 2000
    • January 2000
    • September 1999
    • August 1999
    • June 1999
    • February 1999
raging yoghurt blog | all content © meiying saw | theme based on corporate sandbox | powered by wordpress